Entries Tagged as 'D/s'

ToroGRUE 2 – Mayday!

torogruebannerred

Rumours have been spreading about the possibility of another GRUE happening in Toronto this year. Well, they’re not just rumours, they’re facts. I’m announcing here the dates for the ToroGRUE 2, happening this May 1st at Renegade.

I’m excited to bring Graydancer back to Toronto and to work with the fine folks at Renegade to host an even larger GRUE than last time. The reactions from the participants from 2008’s ToroGRUE at Goodhandy’s were such that as soon as it was over I started thinking of when I could make it happen again. Finding the right venue was the first hurdle, and then making sure schedules would all match up.

Details and a schedule can be found on the ToroGRUE 2 Event Page. I’ll be updating the page as more information firms up. If you’re a member of FetLife (and if you’re not, you really really should be) you can also find out more up-to-date information about the ToroGRUE 2 in the GRUEp.

As before, even though the event has the word “Ropetastic” in the title, the conversation will not be limited to only rope-based topics. Anything kink or BDSM-related can be brought to the event.

Get your brains revved up. You’ve got three months. See you all at the ToroGRUE 2.

On the power of naming a thing (second part)

That’s a picture, taken by Chelsea Miya, of some of my work for the Keyhole Sessions. I think this was taken in early May, quite possibly the second or third session. Chelsea was in the class that night writing an article for NOW Magazine, a local Toronto weekly. She spent most of the class taking pictures of the models, and during the intermission and after the class spoke to the models, the organizer, and myself, about the experience of putting the class together, and a little bit about the ropework that makes up the majority of the second half of the night.

In the article I’m first referred to as “bondage enthusiast” which is appropriate. I’m not sure if the writer chose that particular phrasing after receiving the URL to this site, but regardless, it certainly sets the tone for the rest of the piece. It’s a solid article that really paints the class and the experience of it in a very positive light.

It also uses my name.

It uses my name, to be clear, in a totally consensual way. As soon as I heard that someone from NOW was going to be at the class that night, I knew what was going to happen. Immediately I knew what I was doing, at the end of the night as soon as I started answering the questions the journalist was asking me. In the back of my head, I guess I’d been waiting for the moment to make myself more public – if for no other reason than to be able to stop thinking about having to conceal this side of myself.

In an earlier post, I wrote, “I’ve been thinking of the power behind naming a thing, especially in an environment like this one where a name, once said, is always present.” This is how things are for me, now – it is and will always be present. As it stands, when you google me, the NOW article shows up on either the first or second page – usually right after a bunch of old theatre links and some Twitter highlights. Not that I think I’ll be googled that often, but I do work in the digital media field. You never know. Googling people you meet has become a pastime for some, these days, with SO much information available online – often as a sort of pre-date credentials check.

I don’t care, much, if at all. Things going on in my life right now make hiding any part of myself, especially a part that has given me and continues to give me so much, self-destructive and self-denying to a truly upsetting degree. To continue to spend even the smallest amount of energy in any kind of masking is counter productive to the point of insanity. LIfe is stressful enough as it stands right now to add to it, in any way.

My father’s body is full of cancer – bones, blood and brain. After three years of clean tests it’s come rushing back at a pace nobody could have foreseen. He’s started chemo & radiation, but it’s still too early to tell if it’s had any effect; even if it has, what he is full of is incurable. It’s going to take him, sooner or later. I have no illusions about that. I also cannot help but think about my grandfather, who also (I found out, quite a bit later) died of cancer.

To be clear – this is NOT me sounding some kind of genetic death knell. I am Not quite that degree of pessimist. I have been warned, many times, against holding on to thoughts like this, to “putting that kind of energy out there”. Regardless of what I might think about that sort of energy-philosophy, truly, I’m not. What I am doing is thinking more about how I want to spend my time, and my focus, and my energy.

I’m thinking more about what it means to be named, now, and what it’s going to mean to my life from this point on.

A New GRUE

No, not in Toronto – at least, not yet. I am thinking about bringing Graydancer back up here, sometime in the autumn and holding the second annual (?) ToroGRUE. I can only imagine, based on the number of people who wanted to but couldn’t make it out the last time, that we’d have more than enough interest to make it worthwhile. I know there’s things I’d like to cover in a GRUE that I wasn’t able to get into last time (oh, the trials of the organizationally-minded…) and while it would be fun, I won’t be able to make it* to St. Louis at the end of June for the GRUE In The Lou 2.
The GRUE: Graydancer’s Ropetastic Unconference Extravaganza. Gray writes a bit about the history of the GRUE and the upcoming incarnation in St. Louis here, on BestSexBloggers.com. There’s a link at the bottom of that post to an earlier post on “The Care and Feeding of a GRUE”, which gives a very clear idea of what to expect if and when you choose to attend this most unusual of experiences, the kinky unconference.
And you SHOULD attend. Yes, I’m biased, but I still believe the unconference model leaves the participants with more actual takeaway than an strictly programmed and scheduled-to-the-minute traditional conference. At the GRUE, everyone is a listener, a speaker, a teacher and a student. Everyone participates. Everyone has a say in what gets covered; if you don’t see a topic you want to hear more about stuck on that wall at the beginning of the day, you damn well get up, grab a piece of paper & a Sharpie and you stick it up there yourself. It doesn’t take long to realize that, no, you’re not the only person who’s interested in that very thing. And that’s a good feeling.
There’s more information about the GRUE In The Lou 2 on FetLife. If you’re in the St. Louis area, go. Spend the 25 bucks, book the day off and engage.

* I won’t be able to make it because I’m flying to Berlin on that day. A fair tradeoff, I’d say.

Giving So Much

Max of bondagelessons.com, someone I met at Shibaricon last year and had far too brief a conversation with, recently did two podcast interviews for Dr. Richard Wagner’s show, “Dr. Dick’s Sex Advice”. You can grab the two episodes here (Part One, Part Two) and I highly recommend that you do. Max has obviously thought a lot about everything that he says, and I have to say I enjoy very much listening to someone articulate so clearly something that I believe but haven’t found words for yet.

Some key things from the two episodes that rang very true for me. The idea that after all this time, BDSM is no longer something that Max does, but something that he is. Not to say that I’m quite at that point yet, but the more I find myself both enjoying and recognizing a small degree of skill in “getting my hands bloody in somebody’s head” (another quote from a podcast I enjoy, this time courtesy of Flagg on Power in Practice), the closer I get to that place. He talks a bit about whether a Top needs to have been a bottom, a philosophy I realize many believe to be true but is not my experience nor anything I feel pulled towards. He talks about the difference between adrenaline and endorphin play for bottoms, which resonated with me quite strongly, and how BDSM experiences might or might not include a sexual component.

He also talks about the difference in the return from a scene a Top gets, and how it can very much differ from the return a bottom gets. This was key for me. I find I will often Top from a somewhat distant or removed place, especially as what I’m doing to someone requires a very heightened amount of focus. I am forced, in those moments, to be a concentrated as possible on the actions and influence I’m directing towards the bottom. This can sometimes come across as being somewhat robotic or cold. I often describe my dominant energy or drives as being cold, while the more sadistic or sexual drives are more hot. In this framework, cold equals control. That focus on control means I can’t absolutely sink into the moment and lose myself in what I’m doing – so much danger in that.

Max follows this up with the idea that once he’s brought his bottom to a place of safety & completion, only then is it his turn to get lost in the rush, to give up a bit of that left-brain focus and get a little bit wide-pupiled. This is important, he says, to avoid any resentment on the part of the Top: the bottom gets to have all the fun, why don’t I get any fun?

There’s a lot of truth in this. It’s easy I think to just focus so much on what I’m doing to someone and giving them as deliberate an experience as possible that I don’t concentrate on my completion – because that completion is totally unnecessary. I get FED so much from what I’m doing – from the very fact THAT I’m doing – that the push to finish, to get myself off… it’s just not there. It’s not the point, in that moment. In my experience, however, that’s not the main focus of the resentment. That mindset, when not communicated clearly (and even sometimes when communicated clearly), can result in a sense of dissatisfaction from a bottom; a sense, in fact, that THEY should be doing more for ME.

As if in the simple gift of their body for no small amount of time – blood and bone, nerves and brain – they haven’t already given so much.

pre/post

I hadn’t used this green rope from Gargoyle Toes that much before, but I was experimenting with some new methods of tying and figured I’d use it. Successful experiment, I think. There were a couple of ties from Chanta Rose’s book “Bondage For Sex: Volume 1″ that I couldn’t quite wrap my head around, and wanted to just be able to tie and re-tie and re-tie them until they clicked. Working on fundamentals, I guess. So that’s what I did, and the re-tying turned into more tying, and the more tying just turned into, well, more.

Some time later, when all the ropes came off, there were some seriously lovely marks left.

It had been a LONG time since we’d had a long involved rope-based scene like that. I think we both missed it, and I don’t think it’ll be that long again, before the next time.